Korean Air launches cargo receivables securitisation
Korean Airlines (KAL) has launched a cross-border securitisation involving all its future yen cargo receivables, the first transaction of its kind in Asia.
Neil Campbell, partner and head of the Asian securitisation and structured finance group at law firm Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker in Hong Kong, who advised the joint arrangers, said the deal is the first securitisation of cargo receivables in Asia. He added: “We securitised all the receivables arising from Korean Air’s cargo routes out of Japan. There is a lot of potential for airlines to look at passenger ticket and cargo receivables as a means of raising finance. We’ve worked on a number of passenger ticket deals and this is the first cargo deal in Asia."
Proceeds from the sale of the notes will be used to “repay existing indebtedness”, according to Campbell. He added that the amount of future cargo receivables that’s been securitised exceeds ¥20 billion by a significant amount, but did not reveal the exact figure.The notes pay interest of one-month yen Libor plus 40 basis points per annum. Payments on the notes are backed by future revenues from the sale of cargo services on KAL’s routes from Japan. The issuer also has a credit facility from KDB to support payment on the notes.
The notes are rated A by Fitch and A- by Standard and Poor’s, and are listed on the Irish Stock Exchange.
This is the second cross-border securitisation by Korean Air. In September 2003, the airline launched a securitisation of passenger ticket receivables worth ¥27 billion. Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker also acted as transaction counsel on that deal.
Michelle Taylor, a Counsel in Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker's Asian securitisation and structured finance group in Hong Kong, describes the deal as being “over-collateralised”, which means there is likely to be excess receivables revenues in future after paying interest, principal and expenses on the notes. The extra money would go back to KAL through a seller certificate.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say