WEF backs calls for reverse stress tests
"Glaring gaps in risk management" represent one of the biggest dangers facing the world in 2009, and financial institutions must improve their modelling and testing as a matter of urgency, according to a World Economic Forum report launched today.
Speaking at the launch in London, Oliver Wyman chief executive John Drzik, who helped write the report, said: "There needs to be a focus on risks which can kill the organisation. Several organisations have already set up "black swan committees" to focus on these."
Reverse stress tests, which start by outlining an outcome that would threaten the company and go on to determine what scenario would produce such an outcome, have been recommended by regulators including the UK Financial Services Authority.
Drzik echoed criticisms from several regulators that risk management had been treated as a side issue rather than one deserving of constant management attention. Also, "model builders tend to focus on areas where there is a large amount of historical data, which means they underfocus on low-frequency high-impact risks... There's not enough emphasis on stress testing and quantitative models".
See also: Asset price crashes could continue this year, says World Economic Forum
Stress tests were ignored in lead-up to crisis, Basel risk head says
BIS releases roadmap to better stress testing
FSA plans reverse stress tests
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say