Swiss Re launches $2 billion catastrophe securitisation programme
Swiss Re Capital Markets has begun marketing a $225 million catastrophe bond offering, the first part of a $2 billion programme, that securitises Swiss Re’s reinsurance exposure to five types of earthquake and hurricane risk.
A sixth $50 million class is based on all the perils together. This class pays out to Swiss Re with the first occurrence of any one peril in the basket at a level of severity higher than in the peril’s single-class form.
Pioneer is unique because it addresses a catastrophe securities market shortfall in which large issues based on one risk, say $500 million on US hurricane risk, dominate the market at the time of their issue. This dominance widens the spread an issuer has to pay due to the lack of diversification potential for investors elsewhere in the small, fairly illiquid catastrophe risk market. “The way it’s been in the past with the lumpiness of issuance is that people have been unable to buy a whole lot of them at a tight price, because there’s nothing to diversify it against,” said an investor familiar with the deal. This is especially frustrating to investors whose mandates require specified levels of catastrophe risk portfolio diversification or who are prevented from rebalancing their portfolios by trading in the secondary markets for catastrophe risk, said the investor.
By the terms of the deal, Swiss Re Capital Markets may issue more securities within any of the structure’s six catastrophe risk classes at quarterly intervals up to a final total of $2 billion. By allowing several risks to be issued together on a regular basis, Pioneer allows investors to build their portfolios in a diversified manner. Issuance will be determined by market demand, gauged in part by pricing for a previous quarter’s Pioneer issue.
According to the investor, five classes will be rated BB+, while the central US earthquake class is expected to be BBB-. Swiss Re Capital Markets is not committed to issue any future securities under Pioneer in any one of the perils. For example, all the remaining issues could be in the North Atlantic hurricane risk class, though that would be unlikely, said the investor.
Swiss Re officials did not return calls by press time. Officials at Lehman Brothers, which is said to co-manager on the deal with Swiss Re Capital Markets, could not be reached by press time. An official at EQECAT, the Oakland, California-based insurance risk consulting firm, said to have modelled the deal, declined to comment.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Microsoft outage disrupts structured notes trading
Document-heavy OTC trades upended as term sheets and confirmations languished in outboxes
One-factor rates models sit behind most XVA calculations
Risk Benchmarking: Dealers coalesce around calibration depth, but runtimes and lookbacks vary sharply
Could a prediction market bet get you fired by your bank?
At least half of US systemic banks limit personal prediction trades, but mention markets still a concern
Dealers still split on XVA desks’ funding remit
Risk Benchmarking: Global dealers use XVA desks to manage swaps funding needs, but most treasuries retain some control
How enterprise risk rose to the top of the bank
Previously a support function, ERM is naturally positioned to identify strategic risks for the board
Can prediction markets pass the institutional sniff test?
Regulated firms need credible event determination methodologies and cross-product margining to enable use, say experts
Most dealers run central XVA desks, but remits vary
Risk Benchmarking: Many banks struggle to track XVA costs and share of derivatives compute
EU banks in India cut contingency costs after clearing deal
Esma MoU with two Indian regulators lifts threat to direct clearing for BNP, SocGen and Deutsche