US agencies issue QIS4 and LDCE survey materials
US financial regulators have issued survey materials for the fourth Quantitative Impact Study (QIS4) and the Loss Data Collection Exercise (LDCE) in preparation for the implementation of the Basel II capital framework in the US.
The agencies are requesting responses for the LDCE by late November 2004 and for the QIS4 by late January 2005. The information received should help them to, by mid-year 2005, prepare a joint Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for implementing Basel II in the US.
Office for the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) deputy controller for capital and regulatory policy Kevin Bailey said he expects the number of participants in the LDCE to be fewer than those participating in the QIS4. About 30 US banking organisations are interested in participating in the US version of the QIS4, while the LDCE respondents may well be fewer than 10. The OCC regulates domestic deposit taking institutions.
“The format for the LDCE is quite similar to the one conducted in 2002. We have been in touch with QIS4 participants, and we think they have enough time to respond by the end of January 2005,” Bailey said. The 2004 Operational Risk LDCE is a voluntary survey that asks banking organisations to report the amount of individual operational losses as well as certain descriptive information regarding each loss - for example, date, business line and loss type. The survey asks banks to report all losses that occurred on or before June 30, 2004 or September 30, 2004 – consistent with the data used for the capital amounts that a bank reports for operational risk in QIS4.
The LDCE should provide supervisors with the ability to assess the extent to which the QIS4 results are driven by internal loss data and the factors that an institution considers in its modelling approaches and qualitative risk assessments.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision proposed new international capital standards for banking organisations in June 2004, and the proposal is currently being evaluated by bank supervisory authorities worldwide.
QIS4 is intended to provide the agencies with a better understanding of how the implementation of a more risk-sensitive approach for regulatory capital standards might affect minimum required capital at the industry, institution and portfolio level.
The LDCE is intended to provide insight, based on detailed loss event data, into the implications of the proposed Basel II standards regarding the advanced measurement approaches for evaluating operational risk.
Bailey also said the operational risk benchmarking exercise in all the Basel II mandatory banks was nearing completion. “We are about done with the benchmarking exercise. We will be finished in November or early December,” he said.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities
CCPs trade blows over EU’s new open access push
Cboe Clear wants more interoperability; Euronext says ‘not with us’