Westpac acts over A$11 million funds transfer error
SYDNEY - Westpac, the Australian bank, has begun legal proceedings against former customer Victor Ollis, an estate agent from New South Wales, over a dispute concerning A$11 million ($8.9m) that was mistakenly transferred into his account over a two-year period.
Ollis had an automatic sweeper facility with Westpac, which routinely topped up his business account using money from his personal account. Even though Ollis's personal account became overdrawn, the bank continued to transfer money to his business account from its own funds. Ollis admits to writing cheques with money found in his account, but he denies fraud. Westpac honoured cheques totalling A$11million between June and December 2005 before discovering the mistake in January 2006.
The bank is also suing Ollis's partner, Gail Shields, who received A$4.8million in funds transferred into her account from his.
Shields is defending the case, saying she believed the money legitimately belonged to her partner. Both Ollis and Shields have had their assets frozen by the NSW Crime Commission.
The case continues.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”