S&P downgrades BMO following commodities trading loss
TORONTO – In early June, Bank of Montreal (BMO), Canada's fourth-largest bank, had its credit rating cut by Standard & Poor's Rating Services. The rating agency cited weak risk management as the cause for the downgrade, which followed the biggest commodities trading loss suffered by a Canadian bank a month earlier.
The debt rating for the Toronto-based bank was cut to A+ from AA-, the credit-rating company said – the first S&P downgrade for the bank in 20 years.
"We believe the overall stature of the bank's risk governance in market risk is weak, and BMO must give thought to ways of strengthening this,'' S&P said in the statement.
In mid-May, S&P said it was reviewing the bank's operations after the lender reported pretax trading losses of CAD680 million ($641 million) from trading natural-gas options. The loss was equal to 12% of the bank's net income last year, and "does not reflect BMO's stated strategy of being a low-risk bank,'' S&P added.
According to a report on Bloomberg, BMO expanded trading in natural gas options after prices rose in 2005 following Hurricane Katrina. The bank relied on one broker to price contracts as the portfolio grew, resulting in an "inappropriate level'' of options that lost value when there was a decline in the volatility of gas prices, chief executive William Downe said to the wire service. "The steep level of loss was largely a result of incorrect valuation of the commodity portfolio, which masked the rapid escalation of risk and the real cost of the positions. Our commodity trading team did not operate according to standard BMO business practices. Leadership oversight of the business was not as disciplined or rigorous as it could have been,'' Downe added.
The last time S&P reduced the bank's rating was in May 1987, according to Bloomberg data. The downgrade puts BMO on a par with Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, with the lowest debt rating among Canada's five biggest banks.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB start dates must align globally, says European Commission
Lawmaker could trigger delay to market risk rules in Europe if US implementation drags on
Fed green lights more capital relief trades
Five US banks authorised to issue repeat credit-linked notes backed by financial guarantees
Basel III endgame: why moving fast might prove better for banks
Republicans are pushing for reproposal, but a rapid finalisation may prove less far-reaching
Isda pushes to ‘decouple’ Simm calibration from model changes
Emir 3.0 prompts effort to separate risk-weight revisions from methodology updates
Basel war on window-dressing may smooth liquidity, at a price
Changes to G-Sib charge could curb year-end repo volatility, but also cut balance sheet capacity
One year on, regulators still want a cure for bank runs
Broad support for higher outflow assumptions on uninsured deposits, but that won’t save insolvent banks
Watchlist and adverse media monitoring solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
This Chartis report updates Watchlist monitoring solutions 2022 and focuses on solutions for sanctions (name and transaction) screening and monitoring adverse media and its related elements
Basel Committee reviewing design of liquidity ratios
Focus on LCR and NSFR after Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse, but assumptions may not change
Most read
- Too soon to say good riddance to banks’ public enemy number one
- Breaking out of the cells: banks’ long goodbye to spreadsheets
- Basel III endgame: why moving fast might prove better for banks