EC U-turn on Sepa direct debits
The EC and ECB have conceded to allow “transitional” fees for Sepa direct debits
BRUSSELS & FRANKFURT – The European Commission (EC) and European Central Bank (ECB) are calling on banks to accelerate plans for crossborder direct debit schemes, whether or not interchange fees are charged for the payments.
The EC’s move may be viewed as a reaction to the banking sector’s sluggish implementation of harmonised crossborder payments within the Single Euro Payments Area (Sepa), under the delayed Payment Services Directive (PSD).
The EC and ECB said in a September 4 joint statement that they have indicated to the European Payments Council (EPC) that they were prepared to support multilateral interchange charges, provided fees are “objectively justified and transitional”.
“A European solution has to be found by the banks which is also agreeable to the competition authorities,” said Gertrude Tumpel-Gugerell, Frankfurt-based ECB executive board member. “But Sepa direct debits have to be rolled out in a little more than one-year from now.”
“In this respect, the idea of maintaining at national level the same interchange fee for national legacy and Sepa schemes during a limited transitional phase should facilitate the rolling out of the Sepa direct debit scheme,” said Tumpel-Gugerell. “This would also ensure the necessary level playing-field in the national context for the Sepa direct debit scheme and the national legacy direct debit schemes.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
PRA struggles to follow Fed’s FRTB modelling moves
Market risk experts say minor differences in US rules add up to more incentives for IMA adoption
Lifeline keeps Europe’s hopes afloat for single-sided reporting
Despite Esma’s proposal for delegated reporting of trades, the industry may yet get its wish
EU’s plan to get competitive faces big legislative hurdles
Large and controversial legislative package may be too amorphous to deliver results quickly
FDIC relearns SVB lessons in resolution tinkering
Paring back requirements gets thumbs up from some, but concerns linger
Stablecoin consortia may be ‘interim’ step to solo bank issuance
Former Citi payments head and Ubyx founder says all G-Sibs will issue their own coins
Report once: will Esma’s €1bn reforms deliver the full picture?
Critics say plan to merge three reporting regimes will see scant returns, and won’t mesh with single-sided reporting
CFTC accused of ‘double standards’ on compute futures
Duffy questions ‘long review’ of CME’s contract when Kalshi already offers similar product
Europe’s banks can’t agree on how to fix the output floor
Some want market risk excluded, while others push for greater savings from credit modelling