FSA consults on new liquidity rules
The UK regulator has issued a consultation paper on liquidity risk requirements for financial services that follows recommendations made by the Basel Committee
The proposed rules are largely based on the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's 'Principles for sound liquidity risk management and supervision' but they also take into account the difficulties faced in the market over the past 18 months.
While it remains the responsibility of firms' senior management to adopt a sound approach to liquidity risk management, the FSA proposes the following:
•A new, quantitative framework for liquidity risk management that places greater emphasis on firms' ability to assess liquidity risks and develop policies to tackle them;
•A strengthened qualitative framework for liquidity risk management, with an increased focus on firms' stress testing and contingency funding plans;
•New liquidity reporting requirements; and
•A new approach to firms operating in the UK that are part of a wider UK or international group.
The measures proposed in the paper are designed to enhance firms' liquidity risk management practices and the FSA hopes they will reshape business models over the coming years. They are also structured to enhance the FSA's ability to monitor and supervise firms' liquidity risk exposures.
"We are pleased with the way in which the industry has engaged with us on this issue," says Paul Sharma, director of wholesale and prudential policy at the FSA. "We have put forward a robust set of proposals that we believe will greatly improve firms' ability to deal with liquidity risks, and thereby increase the overall stability of the UK financial markets. This builds on the international work on liquidity that is currently in train."
The consultation period closes on March 4, 2009. The FSA hopes to introduce the new rules in October 2009.
The FSA is also pre-consulting on the reporting requirements for the new liquidity regime. The consultation period runs for a month and the FSA will then look to issue a separate paper in the first quarter of 2009.
Click here for the full consultation paper.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
BofA urges horizontal CCP fix after CME outage, others demur
Analysts say clearing meltdown bolsters case for futures-for-futures exchange with FMX
One in five banks targets a 30-day liquidity survival horizon
ALM Benchmarking research finds wide divergence in liquidity risk appetites, even among large lenders
Bank ALM tech still dominated by manual workflows
Batch processing and Excel files still pervade, with only one in four lenders planning tech upgrades
Many banks ignore spectre of SVB in liquidity stress tests
In ALM Benchmarking exercise, majority of banks have no internal tests focusing on stress horizons of less than 30 days
Quant Finance Master’s Guide 2026
Risk.net’s guide to the world’s leading quant master’s programmes, with the top 25 schools ranked
ALM Benchmarking: explore the data
View interactive charts from Risk.net’s 46-bank study, covering ALM governance, balance-sheet strategy, stress-testing, technology and regulation
Staff, survival days, models – where banks split on ALM
Liquidity and rate risks are as old as banking; but the 46 banks in our benchmarking study have different ways to manage them
CME faces battle for clients after Treasuries clearing approval
Some members not ready to commit to 2026 start date; rival FICC enhances services