SEPA clarification welcomed
European Payments Council issues clarification of Sepa payment cards scheme
BRUSSELS – The European Commission and the European Central Bank (ECB) have welcomed further clarification from the European Payments Council (EPC), the association of banks and banking associations that is setting up the Single Euro Payments Area (Sepa).
In the document, published in question-and-answer format, the EPC clarifies key aspects of compliance with the Sepa Cards Framework (SCF) for payment card schemes and banks, as well as the conditions for geographical coverage of card schemes within the Sepa. It hopes this will facilitate the transition from the existing fragmented and monopolistic national payments markets towards a competitive, Sepa-wide, payment cards market.
The Sepa is a unique initiative of the European banking industry to move from 31 national payment systems towards an integrated euro payments area. Once Sepa is a reality, Europeans will be able to make payments and cash withdrawals in euros throughout the Sepa area as easily as in their home country.
One of the most pressing issues concerns the rules for migration of cards to Sepa. Unlike the comprehensive rulebooks for credit transfers and direct debits, the SCF does not outline any detailed rules and standards, but rather describes three options for attaining Sepa compliance. Market participants seemed to interpret these three options in a way that meant a card scheme is only SCF compliant if it covers all 31 states of the Sepa territory.
The European Commission and the ECB are satisfied by the EPC’s confirmation that – in the context of geographical coverage – compliance with the SCF only requires that cards be technically and commercially capable of being accepted everywhere in the Sepa territory. Therefore, any scheme, even an efficient national scheme, will be able to become SCF compliant, provided that – among other requirements – it is technically and commercially capable of admitting banks from other Sepa countries.
Click here to access the paper
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
PRA struggles to follow Fed’s FRTB modelling moves
Market risk experts say minor differences in US rules add up to more incentives for IMA adoption
Lifeline keeps Europe’s hopes afloat for single-sided reporting
Despite Esma’s proposal for delegated reporting of trades, the industry may yet get its wish
EU’s plan to get competitive faces big legislative hurdles
Large and controversial legislative package may be too amorphous to deliver results quickly
FDIC relearns SVB lessons in resolution tinkering
Paring back requirements gets thumbs up from some, but concerns linger
Stablecoin consortia may be ‘interim’ step to solo bank issuance
Former Citi payments head and Ubyx founder says all G-Sibs will issue their own coins
Report once: will Esma’s €1bn reforms deliver the full picture?
Critics say plan to merge three reporting regimes will see scant returns, and won’t mesh with single-sided reporting
CFTC accused of ‘double standards’ on compute futures
Duffy questions ‘long review’ of CME’s contract when Kalshi already offers similar product
Europe’s banks can’t agree on how to fix the output floor
Some want market risk excluded, while others push for greater savings from credit modelling