Remorseful former Enron CFO receives reduced sentence
In late September, disgraced former Enron chief financial officer Andrew Fastow was sentenced to six years in prison for overseeing fraudulent off-balance-sheet dealings that brought down the company and made him millions.
But the judge in Houston, Texas, Ken Hoyt, did not hand down the maximum 10-year term on the grounds that Fastow had shown remorse and co-operated with government officials.
In 2004, Fastow had agreed to serve as long as 10 years in exchange for testifying against the former top executives of the energy company, which has now become synonymous with corporate accounting scandals and fraud.
Evidence provided by Fastow helped secure the convictions for conspiracy and fraud of Enron’s founder, Kenneth Lay, and the former chief executive Jeffrey Skilling. Hoyt described Fastow as having been "drunk on the wine of greed" but acknowledged that the former chief financial officer had demonstrated remorse by fully co-operating.
"These factors call for mercy," the judge said. Fastow has accused 10 leading investment banks of helping Enron falsify its accounts in return for lucrative advisory fees. The accusations are made in a 24-page legal declaration filed by Fastow in support of a class action lawsuit against the banks brought on behalf of Enron’s shareholders.
In his statement, Fastow said he viewed the banks as well-paid "problem-solvers" who knowingly helped Enron create fictitious financial structures that made the company appear far more profitable than it really was.
Attorneys for Enron shareholders, led by Lerach Coughlin, have already won $8 billion in settlements from a group of banks that includes Citigroup, Bank of America and JP Morgan.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say