European Commission investigates Northern Rock bailout
UK government’s Northern Rock aid package under EC investigation
BRUSSELS – The European Commission (EC) has launched an investigation of the UK government’s restructuring aid package for the nationalised bank Northern Rock. Under the terms of the EC Treaty’s rules on state aid, the Commission will investigate whether the UK government’s actions complied with limitations on aid and restructure packages, or broke rules on competition.
The aid measures carried out since the nationalisation of Northern Rock will continue until at least 2011 while the government’s restructuring plan is implemented. On March 17, 2008 the Commission received notification of the Northern Rock restructuring plan, the day after Northern Rock announced the measures it would be taking to reduce its government debt under the restructuring.
The Commission had already authorised, on December 5, the initial measures taken by the UK government on September 17 and October 9, 2007. The current investigation also authorises the UK government’s December 18 rescue measures.
Rescue aid must be temporary (limited to six months) and reversible, unless converted into a restructuring plan – although the rescue measures may remain in place while the Commission examines the plan. As well as the detailed restructuring plan, the Commission has asked the UK for additional information. The process also allows third parties to comment, to avoid undue distortion of competition.
The UK government has provided about £55 billion in aid and guarantees over the course of the Northern Rock bailout.
Effectiveness of DR plans questioned
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
On cyber risk, tech debt is big banks’ top challenge
Risk Benchmarking: Fragmented stacks make identifying vulnerabilities harder; manual workarounds increase human errors
Trading desks urged to bolster cross-market surveillance
Artificial intelligence could help track market abuse across different instruments and venues
Clearing banks pick holes in VAR-based CCP margin models
New models ease cliff effects, but banks say they are less predictable and prone to undershooting
Hard day’s night: Kalshi’s round-the-clock enforcement head
Robert DeNault wants market-leading tech to handle up to 40 insider trading cases at a time
We won’t copy UST clearing mandate wholesale in UK – BoE
Senior official also indicates that any minimum repo haircuts will likely be calculated at portfolio level
Why Apac CROs are turning risk into strategic advantage
Resilience, agility and AI-driven analysis are becoming as important as traditional risk oversight for Apac CROs
Half of banks use scenarios to set third-party Pillar 2 capital
Risk Benchmarking study finds resilience risk less widely covered than cyber and IT disruption, but more formalised where scenarios exist
Don’t mind the gap risk: regulatory treatment of credit repacks
Gap risk in repackaging is not a credit valuation adjustment for Basel III capital purposes, argues senior quant Andrey Chirikhin