Hackers sell kits on auction site
Hacker toolkits offered for public auction on eBay
LONDON – Hacker toolkits previously restricted to hidden specialist online forums are now being sold openly on global auction sites such as eBay. It marks another disturbing development as the tools of e-crime are becoming far more accessible.
"This is a serious development," says Geoff Sweeney, chief technology officer at IT security firm Tier-3. Until now, novice hackers were required to prove themselves to their peers before getting access to the coveted hacking forums where such kits can be found. Sweeney describes the spread of these kits as “very worrying”.
Their availability on eBay puts complex hacking tools at the disposal of any member of the public with internet access – including stealthy Trojan loaders and website hacking utilities – at the disposal of almost any internet user with a standard eBay and Paypal account. Sales of these kits, although facilitating crime, are legal in most countries. However, there are a growing number of notable exceptions, such as Germany’s ‘anti-hacker’ law.
The tools are usually sold within ethical hacker training courses – legal practice under a contract between company and hacker – whereby the intruder has permission to probe and crack online security systems to highlight weaknesses for improvement. These courses also include educational utilities and certification.
Online crime is growing quickly, with internet fraud figures now outstripping conventional fraud. Companies need to consider extending their security umbrella to protect from the growing number of known and unknown threats to their online enterprises, says Sweeny.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities
CCPs trade blows over EU’s new open access push
Cboe Clear wants more interoperability; Euronext says ‘not with us’