Lehman finds itself down then out
NEW YORK & LONDON - Wall Street workers departed with their belongings from bankrupt Lehman Brothers as a significant percentage of the 26,200 staff globally faced redundancy. The 158-year-old US investment bank filed for bankruptcy in early on Monday, September 15, after failing to find a buyer to rescue it from mounting debt and illiquidity problems.
At the London offices, administrator PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) took charge, initially saying the main UK business Lehman International (Europe) and others had gone into administration. However, several days later chunks of the UK business were purchased by Japanese bank Nomura. PwC also revealed no funds from the New York treasury had reached the firm's overseas subsidiaries, even for staff payrolls.
UK bank Barclays bought some of Lehman's core US assets for $1.75 billion. Barclays has bought Lehman's US investment banking and trading unit for $250 million, and paid a further $1.5 billion for the failed bank's New York headquarters and two data centres. Barclays rejected a wider rescue deal for Lehman before the bank's collapse, pulling out over the weekend of September 13-14 when US regulators failed to guarantee Lehman's trading obligations.
Lehman shares tumbled to under a quarter on the New York Stock Exchange and were suspended in London on the morning of bankruptcy. Its share prices had already been decimated by a third-quarter $3.9 billion loss. That fall was exacerbated by estimated outstanding mortgage debt exposures and the failure of the bank's earlier plans to sell off large parts of its business, including the earlier withdrawal of sovereign wealth fund Korea Development Bank from investment talks.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos