Lehman finds itself down then out
NEW YORK & LONDON - Wall Street workers departed with their belongings from bankrupt Lehman Brothers as a significant percentage of the 26,200 staff globally faced redundancy. The 158-year-old US investment bank filed for bankruptcy in early on Monday, September 15, after failing to find a buyer to rescue it from mounting debt and illiquidity problems.
At the London offices, administrator PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) took charge, initially saying the main UK business Lehman International (Europe) and others had gone into administration. However, several days later chunks of the UK business were purchased by Japanese bank Nomura. PwC also revealed no funds from the New York treasury had reached the firm's overseas subsidiaries, even for staff payrolls.
UK bank Barclays bought some of Lehman's core US assets for $1.75 billion. Barclays has bought Lehman's US investment banking and trading unit for $250 million, and paid a further $1.5 billion for the failed bank's New York headquarters and two data centres. Barclays rejected a wider rescue deal for Lehman before the bank's collapse, pulling out over the weekend of September 13-14 when US regulators failed to guarantee Lehman's trading obligations.
Lehman shares tumbled to under a quarter on the New York Stock Exchange and were suspended in London on the morning of bankruptcy. Its share prices had already been decimated by a third-quarter $3.9 billion loss. That fall was exacerbated by estimated outstanding mortgage debt exposures and the failure of the bank's earlier plans to sell off large parts of its business, including the earlier withdrawal of sovereign wealth fund Korea Development Bank from investment talks.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
DRW chief slams ‘ridiculous’ OCC stablecoin rule
Isda AGM: Wilson warns week-long redemption freeze would deter use of Genius Act coins as cash leg of tokenised repo
Dealers push for more revisions to Basel III endgame
Isda AGM: Goldman, JP Morgan bankers want changes on cross-product netting, CVA and default risk charges
StanChart: UK, EU should copy US ‘commercial’ Basel III
Isda AGM: Exec warns divergent Basel III rules will push trading into less-regulated entities
NBFI oversight ‘no longer adequate’, say BdF economists
Researchers call for stronger supervision of non-bank sector ‘before risks actually materialise’
Why Brexit still stirs up trouble for cross-border business
As EU erects another obstacle, banks consider ways around it – or exit strategies
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading