FSA admits Northern Rock failures and launches reforms
UK regulator admits key failings
LONDON – The UK’s Financial Services Authority (FSA) has admitted four “key failings” in a summary of its internal audit review of the organisation’s supervision of the recently nationalised bank Northern Rock. The FSA says a reform programme will be “advanced urgently”.
The first failing was a lack of supervisory engagement with Northern Rock. Specifically this means the responsible team failed to pay enough attention to the model pursued by the bank’s management as market conditions deteriorated.
The FSA’s line management then failed to provide adequate oversight and review of the quality of Northern Rock’s supervision. Key meetings went unrecorded and senior FSA management remained insufficiently engaged.
The resources specifically directed to Northern Rock’s supervision were inadequate, the report says, highlighting that there were too few people involved and more resources needed.
Lastly, the FSA did not make best use of the information and resources available, with inadequate use of intelligence in calculating the firm’s risk exposure, leading to inadequate execution of supervisory action.
The FSA says the failings found with regard to Northern Rock represent a scenario “at the extreme end of the spectrum”. As part of its wider programme of improvements, it intends to concentrate on core prudential risks, and to create a new group of supervisory specialists to review its engagement with high-impact firms.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Microsoft outage disrupts structured notes trading
Document-heavy OTC trades upended as term sheets and confirmations languished in outboxes
One-factor rates models sit behind most XVA calculations
Risk Benchmarking: Dealers coalesce around calibration depth, but runtimes and lookbacks vary sharply
Could a prediction market bet get you fired by your bank?
At least half of US systemic banks limit personal prediction trades, but mention markets still a concern
Dealers still split on XVA desks’ funding remit
Risk Benchmarking: Global dealers use XVA desks to manage swaps funding needs, but most treasuries retain some control
How enterprise risk rose to the top of the bank
Previously a support function, ERM is naturally positioned to identify strategic risks for the board
Can prediction markets pass the institutional sniff test?
Regulated firms need credible event determination methodologies and cross-product margining to enable use, say experts
Most dealers run central XVA desks, but remits vary
Risk Benchmarking: Many banks struggle to track XVA costs and share of derivatives compute
EU banks in India cut contingency costs after clearing deal
Esma MoU with two Indian regulators lifts threat to direct clearing for BNP, SocGen and Deutsche