FDIC Seeking $200 million fine over Subprime Credit Cards
WASHINGTON, DC - US regulator the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has issued enforcement actions against Atlanta-based credit provider CompuCredit and First Bank of Delaware and First Bank & Trust of Brookings, South Dakota. The regulator is trying to claim as much as $200 million through the US legal system over deceptive marketing practices that breach the Federal Trade Commission Act in the selling of subprime credit cards. The FDIC is also seeking civil money penalties totalling $6.2 million against CompuCredit, and $431,000 against the two banks. The regulator has already settled with a third bank, Columbus and Trust, for $2.4 million.
The FDIC's case is based on improper selling of three categories of Visa and Mastercard credit cards. One of these was a fees-based card package aimed at customers with low credit scores, for which the FDIC alleges CompuCredit failed to properly disclose upfront fees and therefore the remaining credit available. The second product was aimed at consumers with higher credit ratings and offered a higher limit, but failed to disclose the true credit limit for the first 90 days, or that it would monitor purchasing behaviour, and potentially reduce their credit limits based on undisclosed scoring models. The other is a debt transfer card marketed to customers with debt elsewhere. The FDIC claims that CompuCredit offered to transfer the debts off the card and report them to consumer reporting agencies as paid off, when customers were in fact enrolled on a debt repayment plan, did not receive a Visa unless they paid their debts within a year, and when they did it was assigned nominal credit.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
DRW chief slams ‘ridiculous’ OCC stablecoin rule
Isda AGM: Wilson warns week-long redemption freeze would deter use of Genius Act coins as cash leg of tokenised repo
Dealers push for more revisions to Basel III endgame
Isda AGM: Goldman, JP Morgan bankers want changes on cross-product netting, CVA and default risk charges
StanChart: UK, EU should copy US ‘commercial’ Basel III
Isda AGM: Exec warns divergent Basel III rules will push trading into less-regulated entities
NBFI oversight ‘no longer adequate’, say BdF economists
Researchers call for stronger supervision of non-bank sector ‘before risks actually materialise’
Why Brexit still stirs up trouble for cross-border business
As EU erects another obstacle, banks consider ways around it – or exit strategies
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading