FSA fines BBNIB’s Paul Harrison for non-compliance
The former chief executive of Berry Birch and Noble Insurance Brokers (BBNIB), Paul Harrison found himself enduring the wrath of the Financial Services Authority (FSA) in late September. The FSA fined him £17,500 for failing to ensure clients’ money held by the firm was properly protected.
The FSA indicated that it felt Harrison’s period as chief executive coincided with the BBNIB not complying with the FSA’s client money rules.
During his time in office, between January 14, 2005 and May 8, 2006, the BBNIB’s own auditors noticed that the firm was falling foul of the rules on a continuous basis.
Harrison claimed he neither knew of, nor enquired about, any potential failure to comply with the rules. FSA director of enforcement, Margaret Cole, was however, scathing in her criticism. She said: "The client money rules are designed to ensure that money belonging to customers is protected and those responsible for firms which hold client money should appreciate that they are responsible for ensuring that the rules are complied with."
Harrison has accepted personal responsibility for the failings at BBNIB according to the FSA, and it also points out that, in delivering its fine, the FSA appreciates his conduct following the identification of the problem.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness