FSA fines kilminster financial management
LONDON – In mid-June, the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) fined Kilminster Financial Management, a network of independent financial advisers, £42,000 for management and complaint-handling failings that occurred from January 2004 to August 2006.
Kilminster, based in Bristol, failed to treat its customers fairly because it was not handling complaints in good time. In addition, it did not monitor its staff sufficiently or keep appropriate training and competence records.
Kilminster also failed to implement appropriate procedures to co-operate with the Financial Ombudsman Service, the UK body that represents consumers. The ombudsman referred Kilminster to the FSA twice for failures to pay awards promptly, and the FSA had to write to Kilminster about complying with two further ombudsman awards that Kilminster had failed to pay promptly. Kilminster has now complied with both awards and paid both complainants.
The FSA viewed the failings as particularly serious due to Kilminster's "poor regulatory history". In April 2000, the Personal Investment Authority – a predecessor organisation to the FSA – issued a formal warning to Kilminster about its selling practices, training and competence arrangements, compliance procedures and recruitment practices, which resulted in remedial action. The PIA also raised further concerns about record-keeping, training and competence arrangements and compliance procedures in May 2001, which led to additional remedial action.
To rectify things, Kilminster has upgraded its compliance functions by employing more compliance staff, and has increased its management oversight of compliance. It has also engaged independent consultants to review its complaint-handling records and procedures, and its training and competence arrangements. Kilminster agreed to settle at an early stage of the FSA's investigation, and therefore qualified for a 30% discount under the executive settlement procedures.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities