Fund manager charged over 14-year-old Ponzi scheme
SEC supervisors charge a fund manager with a $50 million Ponzi scheme dating back to 1995
The latest fraud comes only a month after news broke of Bernard Madoff's $50 billion Ponzi scheme, which had operated since 2006 without regulatory oversight. The SEC is already in the Congressional dock over the Madoff debacle.
The regulator claims the investment fund manager Joseph P Forte scammed 80 investors with the Ponzi - or Pyramid - scheme. The SEC has now secured an emergency court order to freeze Forte's assets.
SEC spokesman Daniel Hawke said: "As alleged in our complaint, Forte engaged in lies, deception and rapacious behaviour at the expense of innocent investors, many of whom considered themselves his friends and close acquaintances."
Forte had reported 37.96% returns, but between January 1998 and October 2008 made trading losses of $3.3 million, according to SEC-filed papers. During that time, the SEC alleges, Forte secreted millions more dollars in "fees" into his personal accounts.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities