FSA fines mortgage lender
Home and County Mortgages Limited (HCML) has been fined £52,000 by the Financial Services Authority (FSA), for management failures and a lack of "skill, care and diligence".
The FSA found that one of HCML's advisers had inflated customer incomes on mortgage applications and that the company failed to deal with the matter.
The regulator stated that HCML failed to disclose the true cost of the single-premium payment protection insurance being recommended to its customers. In addition, the FSA found weaknesses in the company's sales processes, meaning customers were at risk from unsuitable advice.
Staff at HCML were found not to be following the company's complaints-handling process, nor dealing with all complaints on a consistent basis.
"HCML has been given a significant penalty for breaches of FSA principles, reflecting the seriousness of the misconduct and the risks posed to its customers arising from the management failures," said Jonathan Phelan, head of retail enforcement at the FSA. "We expect firms to have management controls in place to monitor their business effectively, and to deal effectively with misconduct by their staff, particularly where it has an impact on customers."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos