New Zealand Reserve Bank issues non-banking risk management standards
The New Zealand regulator introduces risk guidelines for building societies and credit unions
WELLINGTON, NZ - Risk management standards from the Reserve Bank of New Zealand offer regulatory guidelines for building societies, credit unions and other non-banking deposit taking companies.
The risk management programme guidelines specify that deposit-taking firms are required to put a risk management programme in place, identifying and monitoring credit, market, liquidity and operational risks.
"The development of these regulations is another positive step forward in implementing the new prudential regime for non-banks, which is aimed at improving the future resilience of New Zealand's non-bank financial sector," said Grant Spencer, deputy governor of the Reserve Bank."
The Reserve Bank, which acts as New Zealand's central bank, financial stability watchdog, prudential regulator and supervisor, says firms will need to assess their preparedness for stress events, business disruption, as well as clarify board and senior management responsibilities.
Its guidelines follow a draft consultation paper issued in June, which the Reserve Bank says encouraged generally supportive industry submissions. The Reserve Bank says the new requirements must now be implemented by September 1, 2009.
Click here to read the risk management programme guidelines.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities