FSA letter warns mortgage firms to treat customers fairly
Mortgage firms asked to review arrears and repossessions practice by UK regulator
The letter is the second warning to lenders from the FSA in recent months. It comes in light of its earlier review which found weaknesses in arrears and repossessions handling, particularly in the impaired credit sector of the market, and the fact that increasing numbers of households are at risk of repossession.
"Conditions in the mortgage market are difficult and it seems likely that these conditions will persist for some time," says Jon Pain, FSA retail managing director. "In such a challenging operating environment, it is particularly important for senior management to ensure the fair treatment of customers, including when they go into arrears."
"The fair treatment of consumers in arrears will continue to be a priority for the FSA throughout 2009. Where we find that lenders are not complying with our requirements we will make appropriate and properly targeted use of our existing regulatory tools, which may include enforcement action," he added.
The letter states that the FSA expects the senior management of mortgage lenders and administrators to critically review current arrears policy; critically review current management practices and procedures; and assess whether, in practice, borrowers in arrears are being treated fairly by initiating a review of a sample of cases to assess whether the FSA's requirements are being met.
The FSA expects firms to address any weaknesses as a matter of urgency and chief executives must communicate conclusions and any actions the firm proposes to take to the FSA by January 31, 2009.
Click here for the letter
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities
CCPs trade blows over EU’s new open access push
Cboe Clear wants more interoperability; Euronext says ‘not with us’