OFAC fines National Australia Bank for 'trading with enemies'
SYDNEY - National Australia Bank (NAB) has been fined by the United States' Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) for violating provisions of the Trading with the Enemy Act . The bank's US operation is alleged to have conducted banking transactions totalling A$3 million with persons from Cuba, Burma and Sudan.
Under the terms of the Trading with the Enemy Act, the US government restricts the degree to which branches of foreign banks can do business with companies or individuals in certain countries.
OFAC, which monitors such banking activity from within the US Department of the Treasury, has issued an enforcement statement noting that NAB conducted the alleged transactions between November 2003 and December 2005. Most of the transactions were processed through correspondent accounts held by the group at other US banks, although some were processed through NAB's New York branch.
National Australia Bank, which did not break any Australian laws, has been fined US$100,000 but could have faced a US$1 million fine if it had not disclosed the breach to OFAC.
"Due to the significant remediation taken by the bank, including major upgrades to its worldwide compliance policies, as well as the fact that the violations were voluntarily disclosed, OFAC mitigated the potential penalties for these transactions by nearly 90%," said OFAC.
Anti-money laundering regulators have been concerned about the propensity for correspondent banking to be used to launder money from overseas, which has become even more significant with the rise of the internet.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities
CCPs trade blows over EU’s new open access push
Cboe Clear wants more interoperability; Euronext says ‘not with us’