US SEC sues Sentinel Management Group over client assets
WASHINGTON - The US Securities and Exchange Commission has begun proceedings against cash-management firm Sentinel Management Group, for allegedly lying to investors and misappropriating their assets.
The firm is accused of fraudulently moving $460 million of client securities from segregated customer accounts to its proprietary house account over a period of seven months. The SEC says Sentinel also pledged customer securities as collateral to obtain a $500 million line of credit facility for its own use.
It maintains that Sentinel commingled client assets without the ability to verify ownership of particular securities by particular clients; and provided false client account statements that did not accurately reflect client portfolio holdings or the fact that securities had been encumbered by the firm.
The SEC said Sentinel's customers suffered undisclosed losses for months before the firm sent them a letter on August 13, claiming it could not return their money without selling their assets at a discounts and incurring losses. The letter also falsely blamed the firm's predicament on the current liquidity crisis. Sentinel filed for bankruptcy four days later.
The US District Court in Chicago entered an order requiring the firm to provide a full accounting of client assets and its own assets and liabilities within five days. Sentinel was also ordered to produce certain brokerage and bank documents immediately, to begin the process of determining client portfolio holdings and ownership of securities. The SEC complaint also seeks a permanent injunction, disgorgement and civil penalties against Sentinel.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hopes rise for EU re-entry to UK swaps market
EC says discussions on draft decision softening derivatives trading obligation are ‘advanced’
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns