NASD charges Oppenheimer and CEO Lowenthal
NEW YORK – In early January, the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) charged Oppenheimer and its chief executive, Albert Lowenthal, with knowingly submitting inaccurate and incomplete data in response to NASD's request that the firm perform a self-assessment of its mutual fund breakpoint discount practices.
This is the second time in eight months that NASD has charged the firm with failing to produce documents and information requested by NASD. The first complaint, issued in May 2005, involved an investigation of municipal bond transaction reporting violations.
"All regulated firms have a fundamental obligation to co-operate with NASD requests for information by providing complete, accurate and responsive data in a timely manner," says Barry Goldsmith, NASD executive vice-president and head of enforcement.
"The ability of NASD and other securities regulators to protect investors and police the markets depends upon compliance with that obligation. Today's matter is especially troubling not only because of the firm's repeated lack of co-operation with NASD, but more significantly because, as stated in the complaint, the CEO himself allegedly directed the firm to provide NASD with information he knew to be inaccurate" Goldsmith said.
In March 2003, a report jointly issued by NASD and other securities regulators showed that nearly one in three mutual fund transactions in front-end load mutual funds that appeared eligible for a breakpoint discount did not receive one.
As a result of those findings, NASD required approximately 2,000 broker-dealers that sold front-end load mutual funds during 2001-2002 – including Oppenheimer – to conduct a self-assessment of their compliance with mutual fund breakpoint discount requirements and report the results to NASD. As a result of the breakpoint sweep and ensuing NASD enforcement actions, more than $130 million has been returned to investors who did not receive appropriate breakpoint discounts.
In another matter involving Oppenheimer, NASD announced that it censured and fined the firm $250,000 for at least 230 late disclosures of reportable information about its brokers, including customer complaints, regulatory actions and investigations, and terminations. Reportable information on all registered brokers is maintained in NASD's Central Registration Depository and is available free of charge to the public through NASD's BrokerCheck.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management