Rogue traders hit Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch
LONDON - Investment bank Morgan Stanley has suspended a suspected rogue trader who reportedly cost the bank $120 million (£60 million) by overpricing investments. Matthew Piper, a middle ranking credit trader working at the bank's London offices, was suspended a month ago and the incident has been reported to the UK Financial Services Authority. The news comes after rival US bank Merrill Lynch launched a separate investigation, probing the activities of one of its London-based equity derivatives traders on suspicion of inflating mark prices on single stock derivatives.
Merrill Lynch said its risk management system caught the suspicious trades, said to have taken place in April, while Morgan Stanley has clearly been less fortunate. The bank said it discovered the suspicious investments in the second half of May and believes that they had gone undetected for at least three months. It has disclosed a $120 million "negative adjustment" related to overstated valuations on some of the trader's positions. There are key similarities between the two cases. Both involved the repricing of difficult-to-value investments using mark-to-market models reliant upon highly illiquid markets.
These fresh trading incidents follow January's rogue trading scandal at Societe Generale and another investigation at Swiss bank Credit Suisse. Morgan Stanley's chief financial officer, Colm Kelleher, said the bank had "zero tolerance" of such behaviour.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos