Lisbon trio calls for more market transparency
Call for transparency echoed by the G7 meeting of EU finance ministers and central bankers
Britain, France and Germany issued a joint call for greater market transparency and better risk management at a European Union summit in Lisbon, in advance of a G-7 meeting of EU finance ministers and central bank governors in Washington DC.
In the latest in a series of statements from EU leaders concerning the financial instability caused by the US subprime crisis, the three leaders called for EU finance ministers to examine whether regulatory action or other measures were necessary in fields such as disclosure of information on securitised debt, assessment of illiquid assets and their significance for risk management, and banks’ off-balance-sheet risks.
The joint statement on market transparency, signed by British prime minister Gordon Brown, French premier Nicholas Sarkozy and German chancellor Angela Merkel, states: “The primary responsibility for managing risk is, and must remain, with individual financial institutions and investors. This needs to be backed up by strong national regulatory frameworks.”
EU finance ministers were asked to report by next March or April on issues such as cross-border co-operation and crisis management, the role of credit rating agencies, and companies’ use of these agencies.
Following on from the Lisbon meeting, the joint statement from the finance ministers and central bankers at the G7 meeting in Washington warns that, although the market is improving after the recent global market turbulence, uneven conditions are likely to persist for some time and will require close monitoring.
Finance ministers and central bankers all called on the Financial Stability Forum (FSF) to “analyse the underlying causes of the turbulence and offer proposals in the areas of liquidity and risk management; accounting and valuation of financial derivatives; role, methodologies and use of credit rating agencies in structured finance; and basic supervisory principles of prudential oversight, including the treatment of off-balance-sheet vehicles”.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Op risk data: FIS pays the price for Worldpay synergy slip-up
Also: Liberty Mutual rings up record age bias case; Nationwide’s fraud failings. Data by ORX News
Banks hold 73% of liquidity buffer in cash and Level 1 assets, on average
Largest lenders hold highest share of central bank reserves in buffer, latest analysis shows
EBA supports global op risk taxonomy, but it won’t happen soon
New EU framework designed to ease adoption by banks; other jurisdictions have different priorities
Allocating financing costs: centralised vs decentralised treasury
Centralisation can boost efficiency when coupled with an effective pricing and attribution framework
EVE and NII dominate IRRBB limit-setting
ALM Benchmarking study finds majority of banks relying on hard risk limits, and a minority supplementing with early-warning indicators
Banks split over AI risk management
Model teams hold the reins, but some argue AI is an enterprise risk
Collateral velocity is disappearing behind a digital curtain
Dealers may welcome digital-era rewiring to free up collateral movement, but tokenisation will obscure metrics
New EBA taxonomy could help integrate emerging op risks
Extra loss flags will allow banks to track transversal risks like geopolitics and AI, say experts