US agencies tighten rules over identity theft
The federal financial institution regulatory agencies and the federal trade commission have issued final rules for identity theft red flags and address discrepancies.
WASHINGTON – Final rules for identity theft ‘red flags’ and address discrepancies have been issued by the federal financial institution regulatory agencies and the Federal Trade Commission.
The rulings, sent to the Federal Register for publication, will implement sections 114 and 315 of the 2003 Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act.
Recognising the problem of identity fraud has been slower in the US than in Europe, but the president’s Identity Theft Task Force has recently drawn attention to the billions lost to individuals and businesses through this particular financial crime.
Creditors and financial institutions holding new or existing consumer or other accounts considered at a reasonable risk of identity theft must implement an Identity Theft Prevention Program – to include reasonable policies and procedures for the detection, prevention and mitigation of identity crime.
This new element of risk planning must allow for the detection of certain ‘red flags’ worked into the programme, based on suspicious patterns, practices and activities, and leading to appropriate responses and regular updates.The agencies have provided guidelines and examples of red flags to help implementation.
The new rules also require credit and debit card issuers to develop their policies and procedures to validate customers’ address changes issued shortly before requests for replacement or additional cards.
Users of consumer reports must also develop policies and procedures for receiving a notice of discrepancy of an address from a consumer reporting agency.
The final rules will be effective as of January 1, 2008, with full compliance received from covered financial institutions and creditors by November 1, 2008.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards