Skip to main content

Tribunal upholds spoofing decision despite no ‘smoking gun’

Decision shows trading patterns alone can be enough for UK regulators to demonstrate market manipulation

A hand is shown like a puppeteer, manipulating financial data

A UK court decision has shown that regulatory charges of market manipulation can be upheld even without direct evidence of traders colluding.

In July, the Upper Tribunal upheld the findings of the Financial Conduct Authority that three Mizuho Traders – Jorge Lopez Gonzalez, Poojan Sheth and Diego Urra – were complicit in ‘spoofing’: placing bogus orders to move market prices in their favour.

Lawyers

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

Show password
Hide password

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here