Skip to main content

Journal of Risk

Risk.net

Randomization of spectral risk measures and distributional robustness

Manlan Li, Xiaojiao Tong and Huifu Xu

  • The proposed model considers decision maker’s inconsistent or even random risk preferences.
  • we relate the average randomized spectral risk measure to Kusuoka’s representation of law invariant coherent risk measure.
  • In the case when the information on the random risk preferences is incomplete, we offer a distributional robust model.
  • Our work gives a comprehensive treatment from modelling to preference elicitation, computational of the risk measures and decision making under the robust average randomized risk measure.

In this paper we consider a situation where the risk preferences of a decision maker can be described by a spectral risk measure (SRM) but there is no single SRM that can be used to represent the decision maker’s preferences consistently, due to some kind of randomness in these preferences. Consequently, we propose to randomize the SRM by introducing a random parameter into the risk spectrum. The randomized SRM (RSRM) allows us to describe the decision maker’s random preferences in different states with different SRMs. When the distribution of the random parameter is known (ie, the randomness of the decision maker’s preference can be described by a probability distribution), we introduce a new risk measure: the mean value of the RSRM. In the case when the distribution is unknown, we propose a distributionally robust formulation of the RSRM. The RSRM paradigm provides a new framework for interpreting the well-known Kusuoka representation of law-invariant coherent risk measures and addressing the inconsistency issues arising from observation/ measurement errors or erroneous responses in a preference elicitation process. We discuss in detail computational schemes for solving the optimization problems based on the RSRM and the distributionally robust RSRM. The preliminary numerical tests show that the proposed models and computational schemes work very well. Finally, we discuss how to use step-like approximation and sample-average approximation to deal with the case when the randomized risk spectrums are not step-like and/or the random parameter is continuously distributed, and we derive error bounds to justify the approximations.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

Show password
Hide password

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here