Merge SEC and CFTC, says former SEC commissioner
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) should be merged into a single entity to consolidate futures and securities regulation in the US, a former SEC commissioner argued yesterday.
Speaking in a panel discussion at the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (Sifma) market structure conference in New York on May 20, former SEC commissioner Annette Nazareth lamented that regulators are forgoing an opportunity to consolidate supervisory bodies with overlapping jurisdictions. Nazareth is now a partner at law firm Davis Polk in Washington, DC, and served as director of market regulation at the SEC between 1998 and 2005 and as an SEC commissioner from 2005 to 2008.
"If ever there was a time we should be able to make really far-reaching reforms, then it should be now. So it is very troubling to see that a merger between the SEC and CFTC is pretty much off the table for a year or two – which means it will be off the table for decades. There is absolutely no logic for that," she said. "We are the only country in the world that separates futures regulation from securities regulation. It was probably a mistake when it was done and now is really the time to consolidate it."
Nazareth's comments were echoed by Alan Beller, a partner at law firm Cleary Gottlieb in New York and a former director of corporation finance at the SEC. "From a policy point of view, there is no good reason to have the two agencies separate, and my own view is not only should the SEC and the CFTC be under one roof but also the combined agency ought to have broader jurisdiction over financial products generally. I can't think of a good reason other than political difficulty to not have regulatory consolidation, but I am very pessimistic it will happen," he said.
While supervisory authority for commodity futures, options and derivatives clearing organisations lies with the CFTC, the SEC has oversight of clearing agencies and securities markets. This has led to uncertainty in the past over whether regulation of derivatives markets lies exclusively with one regulator, both or neither.
Derivatives dealers have argued that contracts such as credit default swaps are exempt from regulation by either party, as they are negotiated and traded between 'sophisticated parties' and so are excluded from regulation by the CFTC under Section 2(g) of the Commodity Exchange Act and by the SEC under Section 206A of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
For derivatives to be fully regulated under a combined SEC-CFTC, one of the congressional committees overseeing the two agencies – the House Committee on Financial Services or the House Committee on Agriculture – would have to agree to surrender its authority as supervisor of the new consolidated entity, another major impediment to consolidation.
"The problem is it would be extraordinarily difficult to do because congressional committees simply don't vote to reduce their jurisdiction," said Beller.
The panel bemoaned the "nonsensical alphabet soup" of maintaining four separate banking regulators and advocated not only merging the SEC and CFTC, but also consolidating the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) with the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS). However, Nazareth warned political necessities could lead to the creation of a fifth banking supervisor in the form of a ‘systemic risk regulator' proposed by Treasury secretary Timothy Geithner.
"The OCC and the OTS do seem to be the lowest of the low-hanging fruit but I'm not convinced they will be [consolidated] in the first round of changes. That would be very positive if they were. If we were to create another regulator that really would be ill-advised and although it doesn't seem believable, it is actually possible in this political environment we could end up with more regulators. It's almost preposterous," Nazareth noted.
See also: Geithner calls for law change to force OTC derivatives clearing
Obama selects SEC and CFTC leaders
Portal combat
Lukken calls for regulatory overhaul as he prepares to step down
Vision on
コンテンツを印刷またはコピーできるのは、有料の購読契約を結んでいるユーザー、または法人購読契約の一員であるユーザーのみです。
これらのオプションやその他の購読特典を利用するには、info@risk.net にお問い合わせいただくか、こちらの購読オプションをご覧ください: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
現在、このコンテンツを印刷することはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
現在、このコンテンツをコピーすることはできません。詳しくはinfo@risk.netまでお問い合わせください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(ポイント2.4)に記載されているように、印刷は1部のみです。
追加の権利を購入したい場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
Copyright インフォプロ・デジタル・リミテッド.無断複写・転載を禁じます。
このコンテンツは、当社の記事ツールを使用して共有することができます。当社の利用規約、https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/(第2.4項)に概説されているように、認定ユーザーは、個人的な使用のために資料のコピーを1部のみ作成することができます。また、2.5項の制限にも従わなければなりません。
追加権利の購入をご希望の場合は、info@risk.netまで電子メールでご連絡ください。
詳細はこちら 規制
市場がベーシス取引に関するFSBの懸念を共有せず
業界は、債務発行が増加する中、より厳しいヘアカット規制が市場の容量を制限する可能性があると警告しています。
FCMは、クリプト清算における規制上の不備について警告している
CFTCの意見募集により、顧客保護と規制のない広告に関する懸念が明らかになりました
英清算機関は、EUの同業他社よりも厳しい資本規制に直面している
ICEは、イングランド銀行がゲーム内のセカンドスキンを資本構成の上位に位置付ける計画に反対しましたが、委員らはこれを承認しました。
ECBは、スパイアの再パッケージ化に関する資本の明確化を求めている
再構成RWAについて、ディーラーはカウンターパーティ信用リスクと市場リスクの枠組みの間で対応を分ける
FSBのチーフが、世界的なノンバンク規制の推進を擁護
シンドラー氏は、規制当局が銀行のような標準化された規則を課そうとしているという「誤解」を強く批判しました。
FRBは、SVB破綻後の緊急流動性供給に関する共通意識について分かれている
新たな監督原則は、割引窓口の準備態勢よりもFHLBの資金調達を支持します。
なぜUPIがOTC-ISINの終焉を意味する可能性があるのか
批評家たちは、英国がUPIを拒否すれば、取引報告の簡素化の機会を逃すだろうと警告しています。
欧州委員会のクロージングオークション計画は、市場から冷ややかな反応を受けている
参加者は、EUの株式市場における複数のクロージングオークションの導入案が価格形成を分断すると述べています。