Industry confronts hard choices in CCP recovery debate

CCPs have ways to boost financial strength – none straightforward

recovery-sign-shutterstock-216119518

It is often said that learning to recover from mistakes is more important than trying not to make any at all, but critics of swap market clearing houses claim the sector has got it the wrong way round – investing heavily in the infrastructure required to clear swaps, while the resources and practices that would set them back on their feet after a heavy loss remain scarily inadequate.

At the core of the issue is how CCPs would recover from the default of one or more of their clearing members

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: