A bridge too far?

As exchange-traded funds become increasingly complex and start to resemble structured products, are product providers stretching the limits too far in terms of what should constitute an ETF? By John Ferry

millennium-bridge

The backlash is already under way in the US. Until fairly recently, issuers of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) were rushing to get more and more leveraged and inverse products – which give the investor a short position – on the market. But then, in June, there came a warning from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, which oversees around 4,850 US brokerage firms. “Inverse and leveraged ETFs that are reset daily typically are unsuitable for retail investors who plan to hold them for longer

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here