Structured note issuers warned on faulty disclosures

Fines for BAML and UBS highlight importance of accurate cost disclosures

sec-us-securities-and-exchange-commission
The SEC is targeting hidden costs

Recent enforcement action by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against Bank of America Merrill Lynch (BAML) shows the regulator is targeting structured note issuers that bury costs and fees deep within their product prospectuses, say lawyers.

On June 23, BAML agreed to pay $10 million to settle charges that it misled investors in its Strategic Return Notes products, which were sold as a hedge against market volatility.

This is the second time the SEC has charged a structured note

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: