Structured Products Americas: some welcome consistency in the complexity debate

Richard Jory
06 Jun 2012

Tweet
Facebook
LinkedIn
Save this article
Send to
Print this page

The investment of time and resources by regulators into structured products has been nothing short of astounding, but, despite the progress in the creation of new rules, no progress has been made towards establishing an industry nomenclature that would provide some consistency in the understanding and presentation of the products themselves.

The lack of consistency in nomenclature across the world has been noted, though not acted upon, by the regulators, and the message from Bill Hayden, senior

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/

If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net

You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/

If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net