Why transparency isn’t always good for credit: Caveat lector column

Holy grail or holy cow?

Visualising value-at-risk
Transparency and credit: uneasy bedfellows

In the regulators’ shed of holy cows, few are more highly prized than transparency. Yet what it really is and what value it brings market participants is not entirely certain. Let us not forget that even transparency can be as opaque as a bowl of porridge.

In the Jacobellis vs Ohio case held in the US Supreme Court in 1964 (which centred on whether the state of Ohio was right to ban French film Les Amants on grounds of obscenity), Justice Potter Stewart famously said of pornography: “I cannot

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: