Is 8% for all seasons?

Considering the potential pro-cyclical impact of Basel II and the limited effectiveness of countervailing influences, David Rowe concludes that making the 8% ratio of capital-to-risk-adjusted-assets a discretionary policy variable should be part of the new capital Accord

rowe-jpg
In recent months, this column has considered how introducing greater risk sensitivity into the Basel capital Accord could accentuate the business cycle. Michael Gordy, senior economist at the US Federal Reserve Board, has argued that, in practice, required capital will be smoothed over the business cycle, since the consequences of not doing so are simply too severe. He sensibly maintains that the issue is how to do this with the least damage to the alignment of regulatory and

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here