Term SOFR restrictions spark valuation debate

Ban on interdealer trading leaves dealers divided over accounting treatment of in-demand contracts

Interdealer-trading-ban-means-limited-pricing-visibility
Risk.net montage

Strict trading curbs on derivatives linked to a term version of the secured overnight financing rate, or SOFR, have ignited a debate over whether the hedging instruments should be classified as illiquid assets on dealer balance sheets.

Guidelines from the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC), the Federal Reserve-backed group tasked with weaning US markets off Libor, limit the use of term SOFR derivatives to direct hedging of loans and other cash products referencing the rate. The

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

If you already have an account, please sign in here.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: