Podcast: Piterbarg on medians and machine learning
How the Libor transition inspired NatWest quant’s latest paper on exotic derivatives valuation
How the Libor transition inspired NatWest quant’s latest paper on exotic derivatives valuation
This episode of Quantcast features Vladimir Piterbarg, head of quantitative analytics and quantitative development at NatWest Markets, and a two-time winner of Risk.net’s Quant of the year award.
His latest work, The arcsine law for quantile derivatives, deals with the implications of using the median – or, more broadly, quantiles – for defining the payoff of a derivative product.
The paper was inspired by the fallback rate for Libor contracts developed by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association. Under this protocol, Libor-linked contracts will switch to a risk-free rate plus a Libor Adjustment Spread (LAS), which is calculated by taking the median of the difference between Libor and a replacement risk-free rate over a given period of time.
“As is often the case with my papers, it came from a question from a trader,” says Piterbarg. “He was looking at what spread was being implied by the market that day and he saw numbers that he couldn’t quite understand.”
Piterbarg realised that calculating LAS using the median could lead to inaccurate estimates, chiefly because of the dependence of such measures on volatility. In the paper, he proposes a fast and stable alternative to estimate the expected value of quantiles.
The LAS for various currencies was fixed on March 5, de facto ending the uncertainty around it, but the applications of Piterbarg’s paper extend beyond these specifics; any derivative that uses quantile expectations may be affected by the same statistical bias. One example is a Napoleon option, which pays the return of a security selected by its rank within the underlying basket.
Piterbarg also explains his scepticism of machine learning: applying it to finance, he says, often resembles a hammer looking for a nail.
It is, however, a field he cannot ignore. Piterbarg concedes that machine learning is excellent at interpolating data, though its ability to extrapolate from data is somewhat more uncertain. Earlier this year, he published Deep asymptotics, a paper co-authored with Alexandre Antonov and Michael Konikov, in which they propose a mathematical technique to control the extrapolation boundaries of neural networks.
He is equally unconvinced by recent developments in volatility modelling, which he believes have generated more hype than meaningful results. While models such as rough volatility added new weapons to the quant armoury, he thinks that, at least in rates markets, they are unlikely to lead to a major paradigm shift.
Index
00:00 Intro
01:28 The motivation for researching quantile derivatives
04:42 The results of the study
08:10 The arcsine law and its relevance to derivatives pricing
13:40 Application to Napoleon options and other quantile derivatives
15:15 Is machine learning in finance more hype than substance?
20:25 Current research projects
24:50 The biggest open challenges in quant finance
To hear the full interview, listen in the player above, or download. Future podcasts in our Quantcast series will be uploaded to Risk.net. You can also visit the main page here to access all tracks, or go to the iTunes store or Google Podcasts to listen and subscribe.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Cutting Edge
Georgios Skoufis on RFRs, convexity adjustments and Sabr
Bloomberg quant discusses his new approach for calculating convexity adjustments for RFR swaps
Infrequent MtM reduces neither value-at-risk nor backtesting exceptions
Frequency of repricing impacts volatility and correlation measures
Dynamic margining long/short equity trading strategies
A repo haircut model extends a previous solution for long-only strategies
SABR convexity adjustment for an arithmetic average RFR swap
A model-independent convexity adjustment for interest rate swaps is introduced
Joint S&P 500/VIX smile calibration in discrete and continuous time
An arbitrage-free model for exotic options that captures smiles and futures is presented
The carbon equivalence principle: minimising the cost to carbon net zero
A method to align incentives with sustainability in financial markets is introduced
The cost of mis-specifying price impact
Expected returns can be significantly affected by the wrong use of impact models
Most read
- Quants are using language models to map what causes what
- Reluctantly, CME moves to clear US Treasuries
- The bank quant who wants to stop gen AI hallucinating