Hong Kong seeks European equivalence for Hibor and Honia

For the territory’s crucial renminbi fixings, however, no path to approval has yet been decided


The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is going the equivalence route to get approval for its two local interest rates from European benchmark regulators, but for the territory’s all-important renminbi fixings, no clear path has been charted yet.

Hong Kong is following Asian neighbours like Australia, Japan, Singapore and South Korea in seeking equivalence for its local rates, the Hong Kong Interbank Offered Rate (Hibor) and the HKD Overnight Index Average (Honia), from European benchmark regulators. Having equivalence means local regulators have rules in place that are demonstrably similar or achieve the same outcome as those in the EU. Clinching that parity would allow EU-regulated companies to continue using the overseas rates after the end-2021 deadline.  

“In Hong Kong, we are proceeding with the European Commission with the aim to have registration through equivalence,” says Barry Yip, head of monetary operations at the HKMA. “We are working with CNH [China offshore renminbi] and CNY [China renminbi] Hibor, and Honia will also go the equivalence route, but subject to any refinement after the consultation.

“Meanwhile, other indexes will be handled by the respective owners,” he adds, referring to the renminbi fixings as well as other local indexes.

He says he expects the equivalence process to be “completed by the end of 2021”. 

Will Hallatt, a partner at Herbert Smith Freehills in Hong Kong, says the HKMA’s move to seek equivalence on rates is welcome news for European users of Hibor and Honia, adding that any lessening in their availability would be particularly damaging for a number of European entities that book swaps in those rates.

“In particular we’ve got many back-to-back transactions where people [in Hong Kong] are booking trades back to their EU counterparts, particularly the large investment banks,” says Hallatt. “So I think equivalence will have a broader impact than people might initially imagine.”

But equivalence would only apply to interest rates – the HKMA left foreign exchange fixings out.

Renminbi rebuff

In Hong Kong, the Treasury Markets Association runs not only Hibor and Honia, but also the on- and offshore renminbi fixings, whose future standing is still unclear. The association, however, told Risk.net last week that it had made progress in getting the legal representation needed to register its two fixings, the USD/HKD and USD/CNH. Both are critical benchmarks for any European firm doing business in China, and arguably of far greater importance to EU companies than Hibor or Honia, says an executive responsible for forex markets at an industry association in Hong Kong. 

“If the TMA doesn’t seek authorisation for these foreign exchange benchmarks under BMR [Benchmark Regulation] via one of the other routes – endorsement or recognition – European-supervised entities will not be able to hedge their exposures or take positions using a financial instrument that references these rates or uses them to determine the settlement amount and will need to look for alternatives,” he says.

Having been sidelined on equivalence for the fixings, the association has only two options left: ‘recognition’ from a regulator in an EU member state, or ‘endorsement’ by an EU-registered index administrator.

In March, the TMA said a major sticking point in petitioning for recognition was the requirement that administrators retain a legal representative in a member state. That much-criticised precondition could be re-examined as part of a review of the Benchmark Regulation the EC plans to carry out before the end of this year.

In March, Australia and Singapore became the first jurisdictions to receive a draft decision from the EC declaring their regulatory frameworks for benchmarks equivalent under Article 30 of the Benchmark Regulation. That announcement came less than a month after the EC extended the compliance deadline for third-country benchmarks by two years, to December 31, 2021.

Andy Ng, the senior manager responsible for benchmarks at the TMA, says that, for those two countries, equivalence only covered interest rates because there are no real alternatives to them and because foreign exchange fixings would add time and complexity to an already laden process.

“I heard that the Singapore and Australian regulators think that their forex benchmarks always have an alternative – like WM/Reuters – but for interest rates, it is not easy to get a relevant alternative,” says Ng.

So the TMA has moved ahead on finding a legal representative.

“The situation is getting better because we have now had a referral to a potential legal representative in the EU,” he says. “But at the moment, we are still evaluating our options for all of our benchmarks, including the forex benchmarks. We haven’t crossed out any options.”

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here