Investors bemoan Mifid II best-ex failings

Lack of consistency in data provided by trading venues undermines transparency drive

data-overload
Data deluge: users struggling to cope with Mifid II trade information overload

Financial market rules forcing trade venues to publish data are failing to improve best execution for investors, say users, amid complaints that the information is hard to collect and compare because it is provided in multiple formats.

The Mifid II regime, which came into force across the European Union at the start of 2018, introduced a raft of laws aimed at improving transparency within the region’s financial markets. Among them is a rule, known as RTS 27, ordering trading venues to publicly

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: