Quants clash: machine learning or linear models?

Some studies say the algorithms beat the common models; other studies say the opposite

Innovations in financial crimes – How artificial intelligence and machine learning are changing the game

There is little harmony among quants on what delivers the sharpest forecasts of stock prices: machine learning models or conventional linear models.

And the two camps came to Risk.net’s Quant Summit on March 5, armed with studies buttressing their positions.

Giuliano De Rossi, former head of European quantitative strategy at Macquarie who recently joined Goldman Sachs, told delegates there was “convincing evidence that machine learning can beat linear models”, even accounting for the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options


Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here