
Lesson from alt premia’s horrible year: be patient
Investment approach’s diversification benefits can’t be relied on in the short term
October looks set to be another awful month for alternative risk premia funds and products, which seek to harvest lasting premia from things like stock price momentum and foreign exchange carry trades.
The period since February has been so bad that Cliff Asness, co-founder of AQR Capital Management – and one of the principal architects of the investment approach – has taken to writing notes to clients that reference Ragnarök, the Viking myth about the end of the world.
Asness doesn’t think this is Ragnarök, to be clear. AQR and other alt-premia managers say periods of underperformance are to be expected – even of this length.
Nevertheless, the episode exposes things about investing in alternative premia that have drawn little attention before now.
One is that alternative premia funds and products are highly diverse – a topic we explore here in more depth. Their similar labelling masks big differences in risks and sensitivities, and so the likely path of funds’ returns.
Another is how alternative premia can become closely correlated to mainstream assets and markets.
Diversification from traditional asset classes is seen as one of the main benefits of alternative risk premia investing but it tends to play out over the medium to long term, experts say.
Typical portfolios contain upwards of 10 strategies, but over the short term can have an outsized risk contribution from just a couple of drivers.
Alternative risk premia strategies may be somewhat more alternative than liquid hedge funds, our research shows, but you cannot escape links to traditional asset classes
Antti Suhonen, Aalto University School of Business
At times, strategies that are expected to offset each other fail to do so. That was the case during the first week of February, when US stock markets sold off but both medium-term trend following strategies and shorter-term mean reversion strategies were caught long the market.
Correlations for some common components of alternative risk premia portfolios have been at extremes this year.
The correlation between trend following and equity markets, as an example, has been in the 83rd percentile compared with history, Deutsche Bank research shows. The correlation between equities and equities short volatility strategies has been the highest ever.
Some changes in correlations are just down to luck. But the truth is that most traditional alternative risk premia strategies are poorly equipped to handle sharp market reversals, says Spyros Mesomeris, head of quant research at Deutsche Bank.
Strategies such as investing in quality or low-beta stocks, or trend following across asset classes rely on a prolonged period of volatility or drawdowns before they start to work. “There needs to be a rotation before they kick in,” he says.
Antti Suhonen, a professor at Aalto University School of Business and consultant with MJ Hudson Allenbridge, is currently researching how alt premia’s beta to core equity and bond markets changes over time. Initial findings show the sensitivity has been quite persistent, yet volatile, he says.
Work Suhonen has done to break down the source of returns in diversified portfolios of alternative premia strategies shows that up to two-thirds can be explained by reference to traditional asset classes. “Alternative risk premia is not in a world of its own,” he says.
“Alternative risk premia strategies may be somewhat more alternative than liquid hedge funds, our research shows, but you cannot escape links to traditional asset classes.”
Ragnarök or not, the lesson for investors seems clear. “Don’t rely too heavily on the diversification potential of these investments over a short horizon,” Mesomeris says.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Our take
Data shines light on Tibor fragility
Lack of actual transactions in D-Tibor should be considered in fallback discussions
Living with SA-CCR, one year on
Collateral agreements and FX futures may be some of the ways to tackle increased capital costs
GFXC to entice buy-side code adoption with ESG tie-ups
Rating agency partnerships would link FX code adoption to ESG scores
Clock ticking on UK plan for regulatory reforms
Changes to SMCR and short-selling rules least likely to be completed before next election
How did EU regulators miss the FTX horror story?
Gruesome accounting practices and a questionable cast: plenty of grounds to reject Mifid licence
ARRC’s trivial fight over term SOFR use
Toyota’s ABS deal should not derail effort to expand use of term rate in derivatives
What happens when a bank drops off the systemic risk radar?
Russia’s Sberbank skipped this year’s G-Sib assessment. But just because a bank is invisible doesn’t mean it no longer poses a risk
Degree of influence 2022: in the grip of volatility
Rough volatility, liquidity and trade execution were quants’ top priorities this year