Experts dismiss research showing flaw in value strategies

Academics who argue quant value strategies select companies with inflated accounts miss the point, say industry players

calculation
Recent paper says systematic value strategies tilt towards puffed-up numbers

Systematic value investing seems under siege, but factor investors are coming to its defence.

Facts about Formulaic Value Investing, a recent paper co-authored by a Berkeley academic, says systematic value strategies – which often rely on simple accounting ratios – end up tilting blindly towards stocks in companies with puffed-up numbers.

Yet industry players have brushed aside the concerns, saying the point of a factor-based approach is not to select underpriced stocks but to harvest a long

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: