‘Great rotation’ highlights clash over unseen risks in factor investing

Gaps in performance of apparently similar products rekindle debate on index construction


From the US election to mid-January a 126 basis point gap opened up in the returns of two popular iShares exchange-traded funds (ETFs), even though both aim to capture a premium from the same value factor (see table 1).

Meanwhile, similar disparities have been in evidence elsewhere across the factor investing space.

Numbers collated by Morningstar for Risk.net show the gap between the best and worst of the main quality-factor ETFs, for example, was 136bp over the same period (see table 2).


Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here