JP Morgan Chase to spend over $100 million on new credit risk system
The executive committee of JP Morgan Chase has “essentially approved” a budget in excess of $100 million to be spent on creating a new integrated credit risk management system, according to Dennis Oakley, a managing director in the firm’s credit portfolio group.
He admitted that there are still remnants of credit risk systems developed at Manufacturers Hanover Corporation (which was subsumed into the Chemical Banking Corporation in 1991; the latter subsequently merged with Chase Manhattan in 1996, four years before the creation of JP Morgan Chase). “Back then, the only products were loans and deposits. Things have changed,” he added.
In the interim, loan syndications, and the secondary loans and credit derivatives markets, have flourished. Oakley said JP Morgan Chase’s recent filings elicit a “curious” fact: total derivatives receivables on balance sheet now exceed the $70 billion size of its commercial and industrial loan book, by more than $10 billion.
He pinpointed gaining an ability to quickly and accurately aggregate risk as of paramount importance. There’s also a need to generate a value-at-risk [figure] for the entire credit portfolio, and comprehensively stress test the credit risk book, as is currently done with the firm’s market [risk] book, according to Oakley. “Our view is that at some point in the not too distant future we will be marking-to-market the loan book,” he added.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Technology
CME offers basis traders a leg up
New Treasury Link service ‘levels playing field’ in strategy dominated by high-speed players
Stablecoin consortia may be ‘interim’ step to solo bank issuance
Former Citi payments head and Ubyx founder says all G-Sibs will issue their own coins
CTRM software house of the year: Hitachi Energy
Energy Risk Awards 2026: Software developer’s portfolio approach meets changing needs of energy market participants
What is driving the ALM resurgence? Key differentiators and core analytics
The drivers and characteristics of a modern ALM framework or platform
Are EU banks buying cloud from Lidl’s middle aisle?
As European banks seek to diversify from US cloud hyperscalers, a supermarket group is becoming an unlikely new supplier
Inside the company that helped build China’s equity options market
Fintech firm Bachelier Technology on the challenges of creating a trading platform for China’s unique OTC derivatives market
AI ‘lab’ or no, banks triangulate towards a common approach
Survey shows split between firms with and without centralised R&D. In practice, many pursue hybrid path
Everything, everywhere: 15 AI use cases in play, all at once
Research is top AI use case, best execution bottom; no use is universal, and none shunned, says survey