Reuters outage raises BCP questions
LONDON – The pitfalls of relying on electronic systems was made clear to FX traders in mid-October, as a power outage at Reuters' technical centre left it without pricing in European currencies for seven hours. The outage, which began at 2.34pm in London (9.34am in New York) on Tuesday, October 12, hit real-time data from the vendor's dealing platforms, so that the data from trades on Reuters Dealing and the EBS spot FX platform did not feed through to Reuters' datafeed. To avoid the risk of displaying off-market rates, traders had to make prices for their own platforms manually, in a throwback to the pre-electronic era. Some trading on Dealing 3000 terminals in London were also affected, said a spokesperson: "Customers may have lost access to European end-of-day data and FX transactional capabilities."
Some services were back up after the close of London trading at 8.34pm, although others, such as historical news data, were left with gaps for the rest of the week. Because of the timing, traders in the US time-zones were hardest hit.
"It was a pain," said one currency trader at a US bank in New York. "It left a lot of people with no idea where the market was."
The problems were replicated in Chicago. "There has been lower volatility," reported a trader at one investment firm. "A lot of banks make their prices based on that data." And back in London, brokers were fuming. "It cost us in broking business," said one source at a major FX broking house. "Our information feeds were down. People take Reuters data as de facto prices to run models. If people can't generate indicative prices, they can't do business."
While Reuters does not have a monopoly on FX pricing – main rival EBS has its own datafeed – for coverage of sterling crosses and other European currencies, such as the Scandinavian crosses, Reuters' data is – usually – unrivalled. "Liquidity was drained out of the market in those currencies that are not on EBS," said another trader in New York.
The outage also affected vendors that use Reuters' price data. Edinburgh-based WM Company, a subsidiary of State Street that provides market data for investors, was unable to produce its price fixings, for example. Another vendor that uses Reuters data as a key part of its offering said: "It is thoroughly inconvenient and pretty annoying."
Reuters said the problems were due to a power outage following the failure of circuit breakers in two of the firm's four power cabling units. The firm is still investigating the impact and cause of the disruptions, said a spokesperson. But in the current climate, with business continuity plans and disaster recovery high on the agenda for banks, financial institutions and vendors alike, those answers can't come soon enough for Reuters' customers. "It raises questions about the redundancy Reuters has built into its data centres and networks to have data unavailable for hours," said one banker in New York. OpRisk
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Technology
Dismantling the zeal and the hype: the real GenAI use cases in risk management
Chartis explores the advantages and drawbacks of GenAI applications in risk management – firmly within the well-established and continuously evolving AI landscape
Chartis RiskTech100® 2024
The latest iteration of the Chartis RiskTech100®, a comprehensive independent study of the world’s major players in risk and compliance technology, is acknowledged as the go-to for clear, accurate analysis of the risk technology marketplace. With its…
T+1: complacency before the storm?
This paper, created by WatersTechnology in association with Gresham Technologies, outlines what the move to T+1 (next-day settlement) of broker/dealer-executed trades in the US and Canadian markets means for buy-side and sell-side firms
Empowering risk management with AI
This webinar explores how artificial intelligence (AI) can strip out the overheads and effort of rapidly modelling, monitoring and mitigating risk
Core-Payments for business leaders: why real-time access to payment data is key to long‑term business success
Business leaders require easy access to timely, reliable and complete information across post-trade processes. Aside from the usual requirements of senior managers to optimise for risk, revenues and costs, they increasingly need to demonstrate to their…
Risk applications and the cloud: driving better value and performance from key risk management architecture
Today's financial services organisations are increasingly looking to move their financial risk management applications to the cloud. But, according to a recent survey by Risk.net and SS&C Algorithmics, many risk professionals believe there is room for…
Machine learning models: the validation challenge
Machine learning models are seeing increasing demand across the capital markets spectrum. But how can firms improve their chances of gaining internal and regulatory approval for these type of models?
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
- Filling gaps in market data with optimal transport