
FXall edges ahead of rivals
The battle for market-share in Europe appears to remain wide open, according to the survey. Thirty one percent of corporates polled in Europe named FXall as their preferred platform, compared with 29% for Currenex.
But FXall has a clear lead among US corporates. Among those polled, 65% of corporates cited FXall as their preferred multi-provider platform, compared with 30% for Currenex.
The institutional side also saw FXall ahead in Europe, with 25% of the vote, but in the US, State Street’s FX Connect was preferred by 57% of institutions.
ClientKnowledge added that while Currenex’s volumes, in the firm’s opinion, are static, FX Connect’s volumes have nearly doubled in the last six months, and "FXall is enjoying considerable growth".
"FX Connect’s volumes have increased by 80% in the past six months," said Simon Wilson-Taylor, head of State Street’s Global Link platform, which hosts FX Connect. "That’s the sort of growth we have been seeing since we launched."
Lori Mirek, president and chief executive of Currenex, said: "Currenex’s customer base has been exploding, with more than 1,900 connected users."
The report also concluded that the multi-bank sector will continue to experience strong growth in uptake.
"The space has now moved from a situation where people were looking at platforms to where they are actively considering integrating multi-bank trading into their workflow," Justyn Trenner, chief executive of ClientKnowledge, told RiskNews' sister publication FX Week.
Among European corporates polled by ClientKnowledge, 5.6% traded over 50% of their FX volume electronically, but 12.8% expect to trade over 50% into 2003. Of European institutions polled, 14.3% expect to trade over 50% in 2002/03, from 5.6% in 2001/02.
In the US, meanwhile, 9.2% of corporates currently trade over 50% through the portals, with that figure expected to grow to 15.5%. But it is in the US institutional sector that the most uptake is expected, according to the survey. The number of corporates trading over 50% through portals is 19.6% currently, but that is expected to grow to 28.3% in 2002/03, the survey said.
Part of this enthusiasm has arisen due to Atriax’s exit from the multi-bank arena in April 2002. "With Atriax gone, three main providers and a number of smaller players with slightly different models still provide plenty of choice," the report said. "Although the buy-side will favour a degree of competition, too much choice proved a show-stopper last year."
Atriax’s demise has also banished the issue of liquidity in determining the relative merits of the competing portals. Following Atriax’s closure, the report said, most of the major FX liquidity providers have started to participate in all three of the main platforms, removing liquidity as an area of keen competition between the portals.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Technology
Risk applications and the cloud: driving better value and performance from key risk management architecture
Today's financial services organisations are increasingly looking to move their financial risk management applications to the cloud. But, according to a recent survey by Risk.net and SS&C Algorithmics, many risk professionals believe there is room for…
Machine learning models: the validation challenge
Machine learning models are seeing increasing demand across the capital markets spectrum. But how can firms improve their chances of gaining internal and regulatory approval for these type of models?
Banks strive for machine learning at quantum speed
Embryonic work on quantum neural networks raises hope of faster, more accurate models
Big banks seek solace in quantum-proof encryption
Barclays, JP Morgan and SocGen act to counter threat from next generation of computing
Facing the future: the growth of automation in Asia‑Pacific fixed income trading
How can automation improve fixed income trading strategies and best execution? In a recent Asia Risk webinar, in partnership with Tradeweb, a panel of market experts discussed the outlook for automation in the trading space
Moonshots and machines: can AI solve the problems of fincrime?
New technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning promise much in the battle against financial crime, but where are these solutions best deployed? A panel of anti-money laundering and analytics professionals convened for a Risk…
Next-generation technologies and the future of trading
At a Risk.net webinar in association with capital markets technology provider Numerix, panellists discuss the potential for increased adoption of the public cloud to boost investment performance, its impact on risk management and overcoming barriers to…