Jorge A Chan-Lau

Both the risk management profession and the financial supervisory and regulatory framework are undergoing deep structural changes brought on by the global financial crisis of 2008. Standard market and regulatory practices, deemed appropriate before the crisis, have since proven to be the opposite. A key shortcoming was that risk management and prudential measures focused too narrowly on financial institutions as stand-alone firms. In fairness, it has long been recognised that systemic risk, or the collapse of the financial system following the failure of one institution, is a potential threat to the smooth functioning of markets and the economy. However, until the crisis erupted there were not strong enough incentives to overhaul market practices and the regulatory framework to deal explicitly with systemic risk.

The crisis brought an end to complacency. Nowadays, market analysts, regulators and supervisors alike face the challenge of evaluating the risk profile of financial institutions in a systemic context. Such analysis can no longer be limited to the risk of an institution on a stand-alone basis. Rather, the focus has shifted to understanding what role they play within the

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here