Extending the risk horizon

Christian Meyer and Peter Quell

As Christoffersen, Diebold and Schuermann (1998) have pointed out, there is no single “all-purpose” time horizon for risk management and risk measurement. Several aspects may influence the choice of the relevant horizon:

    • regulatory capital for market risk is usually computed on a 10-day horizon, whereas Basel’s Pillar 2/ICAAP approaches mostly use horizons such as one year and beyond;

    • risk horizons vary by asset class – eg, a listed equity may be associated with a one-day horizon, whereas a corporate bond or an emerging market sovereign bond is more likely to have a longer horizon; and

    • risk horizons may also vary from industry to industry (eg, banking versus insurance versus asset management).

A key ingredient of any useful QRM for market risk is an adequate description of volatility dynamics. For example, the adaptive market risk model introduced in the previous chapter relies heavily on the correct treatment of changes in market volatility. In contrast, the ordinary historical simulation approach with equally weighted scenarios had difficulties in adjusting to changing market volatilities, and as a consequence produced a

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here