Intesa Sanpaolo takes $235 million hit for AML failures

Megan van Ooyen from SAS rounds up the top five operational risk losses for December 2016

Intesa Sanpaolo officers manually bypassed automated controls, resulting in sanctions breaches

Efforts to combat money laundering and prevent transactions with internationally sanctioned entities have been a priority of financial regulators around the globe in recent times – nowhere more so than in the US. Take, for example, the New York Department of Financial Services (DFS), which has significantly ramped up its Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering enforcement actions in the past few months.

In December, the regulator obtained a multimillion-dollar settlement from Intesa Sanpaolo

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to View our subscription options

If you already have an account, please sign in here.


Want to know what’s included in our free registration? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

Investment banks: the future of risk control

This survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here